Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2024, 6:18 pm
The Introduction considers the relevance of preparatory documents to the memorialization of intention and its related problems: (1) should text be burdened by an individual or group's intentions? [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
Hamidi, 30 Cal.4th 1342, 1 Cal.Rptr.3d 32, 71 P.3d 296 (2003). [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:01 am
Approximately at the same time as the Executive Order that we described in Part 1 was issued, the Attorney General (AG) unofficially released 90 pages of Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM), which will become official once published in the Federal Register. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:30 pm
The Court in Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite found hackers to be third parties under Article 4(10) GDPR (at 71). [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm
Why does the USPTO audit registrations? [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
First, a set of Draft Principles were circulated in November 2010.[1] After a period set aside for public comment and following revision of the text,[2] the SRSG circulated the final version of the UNGP (with an included Official Commentary) in March 2011 annexed to his (final) 2011 SRSG Report,[3] the text of which was substantially revised from the circulated November 2010 Draft. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
Negligence does. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
”[1] – ‘Stable Diffusion Litigation’ (website created by attorneys on behalf of the artists) “If a work is transformative…then it’s not a violation of copyright and the plaintiff simply has no ground on which to stand to file a copyright infringement case…[T]hose who refuse to acknowledge advancements in technology and instead fight against them are like whittlers mad at power tools. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
TerrorismTracker provides event records on terrorist attacks since 1 January 2007. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
Maples, 309 F.3d 1068, 1070-71 (8th Cir. 2002) 5 Bowers v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
Maples, 309 F.3d 1068, 1070-71 (8th Cir. 2002) 5 Bowers v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:22 am
While the UPC qualifies to submit request for preliminary rulings to the CJEU in accordance with Article 267 of the TFEU, the PMAC does not. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am
He pointed out that ‘the place where the harmful event occurred’ within the meaning of that provision does not cover the place where the assets of an indirect victim are affected. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:11 pm
The judgment helpfully walks through the existing case law, including in particular the Court of Appeal decision in Evans v Cig Mon Cymru [2008] 1 WLR 2675, on when an amendment falls to be considered under CPR 17.4 rather than CPR 17.1 ([46]-[52]). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
After the defendant, through Cunha, filed a motion to disqualify Judge Adelman from the proceedings on the ground of bias, on December 1, 2021, a hearing was held on the motion to disqualify. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm
On October 1, 2023, Robert F. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
Under s.1(1) if a publication does not cause, or is not likely to cause, serious harm to reputation it is not defamatory. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
The Colorado Supreme Court later held that Colorado Revised Statutes section 1-1-113(1) affords such voters the right to bring such a suit.[1] (Colorado’s constitution doesn’t impose any “standing” limitations, such as those the U.S. [read post]
The GDPR as a cyber risk management system: the ECJ cautiously tackles data breaches in the NAP case
22 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm
To preserve the effectiveness of Art 82(1), it is the controller who bears the burden of proving the appropriateness of TOMs in light of the security principle enshrined in Art 5(1)(f) and the rules of general application contained in Arts 24(1) and 32(1) at stake in actions for damages (paras 50-52). [read post]
