Search for: "Does 1-88"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,095
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 2:08 pm
Another 88 (2.7%) contributed only to Republicans. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:36 am
It bears emphasizing that “tailoring” does not mean widescale exemptions. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
First, a set of Draft Principles were circulated in November 2010.[1] After a period set aside for public comment and following revision of the text,[2] the SRSG circulated the final version of the UNGP (with an included Official Commentary) in March 2011 annexed to his (final) 2011 SRSG Report,[3] the text of which was substantially revised from the circulated November 2010 Draft. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm
§ 215.2(d)(1). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:23 am
It will be applicable as of 1 January 2025. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
1) held the San Diego County Board of Supervisors committed a prejudicial abuse of discretion in granting project opponents’ appeals of the Planning Commission’s decision upholding County’s use of the CEQA Guidelines section 15183 exemption for a construction debris and inert materials recycling facility project. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
§ 9792.21.1(d)(1), other medical treatment guidelines such as the ACOEM and ODG at 8 Cal. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
IPSO 20762-23 Dale v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 22502-23 Complainant v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO meditation Resolution Statement – 00041-24 A man v Mail Online, 6 Children (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Statements in open court and apologies On 20 February 2024, there was a statement in open court in the case of Tayler v… [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
TerrorismTracker provides event records on terrorist attacks since 1 January 2007. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
EPA’s Rule contains 5 pages laying out that process. (88 Fed. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
J. 67, 88 (2012). [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 10:55 am
The most likely targets include districts 61 (SW Milwaukee suburbs), 88 and 89 (both in the Green Bay area), and either 85 (Wausau) or 30 (Hudson). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
” What does that mean for securities law, particularly the laws related to fraud and manipulation? [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 2:35 am
The EPC does not define "substance or composition". [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:11 pm
The judgment helpfully walks through the existing case law, including in particular the Court of Appeal decision in Evans v Cig Mon Cymru [2008] 1 WLR 2675, on when an amendment falls to be considered under CPR 17.4 rather than CPR 17.1 ([46]-[52]). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm
Congress is allowed to say (as it often does) that something can be excluded from gross income or deducted when computing taxable income, but that does not mean that the exclusion or deduction was not income in the first place. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
Under s.1(1) if a publication does not cause, or is not likely to cause, serious harm to reputation it is not defamatory. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:17 am
There thus does not ne [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 7:45 am
The GC replied that “The disclosure of an earlier design within the meaning of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 does not, as such, constitute a fact within the meaning of Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002, but the ‘result of a factual assessment’, EUIPO being required to examine all evidence submitted in order to establish whether it actually proves disclosure of the earlier design” (para 87) and that “the disclosure of an earlier… [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
I, § 8, Cl. 4, because it was initially applied only in the 88 federal judicial districts that have United States Trustees but not in the 6 districts that have Bankruptcy Administrators. [read post]
