Search for: "Does v. Barry"
Results 41 - 60
of 868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2023, 9:51 am
Manginelli v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Indeed, according to the Restatement (Second) of Torts, "the republisher of either a libel or a slander is subject to liability even though he expressly states that he does not believe the statement that he repeats to be true. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Whether petitioner intends to publish the information on a publicly available website is irrelevant to the applicability of the exemption since "access to government records does not depend on the purpose for which the records are sought" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 274 [1996]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 59 AD3d 353, 355 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Whether petitioner intends to publish the information on a publicly available website is irrelevant to the applicability of the exemption since "access to government records does not depend on the purpose for which the records are sought" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 274 [1996]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 59 AD3d 353, 355 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm
Barry v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
…The post Cloud computing services not subject to PST says BC court: Hootsuite Inc. v British Columbia (Finance) appeared first on Barry Sookman. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
[Volokh v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
R. 501.5 See United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
R. 501.5 See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
(b) Does the 1977 Act provide for the grant of a patent without a named human inventor? [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:57 am
Does this extend to the director paying back the portion of their salary that was attributable to the tort? [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
From Volokh v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 11:12 am
The post <i>Volokh v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Mezey v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
See Baxter v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 10:52 am
From an order today in Doe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 7:48 am
Or does it mean made-up facts about her? [read post]
