Search for: "Douglas Greene v. UPS" Results 41 - 60 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
It was unconscionable to me that that information would end up in the hands of somebody that shouldn't. . . .Watkins v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:36 am by INFORRM
  We pointed out in a post in April 2010 that the new law of privacy has been developed through five cases in the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords:  Douglas v Hello! [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
His co-Defendants are the “Gay Zombies,” who have the pseudonyms, Adam Zombie, Brian Zombie, Christopher Zombie, Douglas Zombie, Edward Zombie, and Frank Zombie, along with the unidentified financial backers. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
In a case with echoes of Douglas v Hello, Puerto Rican singer Noelia sued a Spanish language gossip magazine when it published pictures of her wedding to her manager. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
”"As classes start up again, some readers might be interested in the Washington Post's review of Elizabeth Green's Building a Better Teacher: How Teaching Works (and How to Teach it to Everyone) (Norton). [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 3:15 pm
Douglas, 904 F.2d 1372, 1378 (9th Cir. 1990)). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:40 am by Maya Risman
Claims of discrimination under Title VII  are governed by a tripartite burden-shifting test established by McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:58 pm by Mark Walsh
During oral argument in 1996 in a case involving blockades of abortion centers, Schenck v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:25 pm
Todd Smith, author of the recently-launched Texas Appellate Law Blog, offered up an interesting piece yesterday on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Hall Street Associates LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
Brown is almost as dull as Sir (Lord) Alec Douglas- Home and Stanley Baldwin. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
In this line of authority the court has taken the view that a claim for (what is really) defamation has been dressed up in the guise of another cause of action, breach of confidence (See Service Corp International plc v Channel Four [1999] EMLR 83 and Tillery Valley Foods Ltd v Channel Four [2004] EWHC 1075 (Ch)) for instance, in an attempt to get round the rule in Bonnard v Perryman and take advantage of the relatively beneficent American Cyanamid or section 12… [read post]