Search for: "Douglas v. Green"
Results 41 - 60
of 335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:08 pm
McDonnell Douglas, Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 7:21 pm
(McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:47 am
Green. [read post]
14 May 2022, 9:31 am
McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 10:46 am
The High Court held (following R (Notting Hill Genesis) v Camberwell Green Magistrates’ Court (2019) EWHC 1423 (Admin)), that in order to discharge the statutory duty, the Court must answer three questions Question 1. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
., that the burden should be on the defendant to establish qualified immunity); Aisha Green, Comment, Comparing Dadd v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
Green. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
Green (1973) 411 U.S. 792 (“McDonnell Douglas”). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 3:11 pm
Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973). [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) (McDonnell-Douglas test), whereas others have taken more convoluted approaches. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
In Lawson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:55 pm
Amy Adler, Vince Blasi, Erwin Chemerinsky, Jamal Greene, Michael McConnell, Robert Post, Fred Schauer, Geoffrey Stone, and Rebecca Tushnet, as well as Judges Stephanos Bibas, Jose Cabranes, Douglas Ginsburg, Raymond Randolph, Neomi Rao, Robert Sack, David Stras, Jeffrey Sutton, and Diane Wood. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:28 pm
Green. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:49 am
Jamal Greene Prof. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:05 pm
Mahanoy School Dist. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 3:25 pm
Jamal Greene Prof. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
