Search for: "Doyle v. State Bar"
Results 41 - 60
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 9:28 am
United States 17-5165Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:31 am
United States, 16-9649, Richter v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 1:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:15 am
A trio of cases – Doyle v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Robbin Smith et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:17 am
Justice Dufficy’s legal analysis beginning at page 6 of his decision includes an excellent review of the statutory standard and interpretative case law governing dissolution of LLCs, citing familiar cases such as 1545 Ocean Avenue, Doyle v Icon, and (pardon the self-promotion) a couple of cases I litigated and won (Natanel v Cohen and Sieni v Jamsfab, LLC). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
According to an official Minnesota State Bar Association publication, Gruender “knocked his father to the floor before his 12-year-old brother could be shot. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:10 am
Doyle, 274 A.2d 577 (N.J. 1971). [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:10 am
Doyle, 274 A.2d 577 (N.J. 1971). [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:25 pm
As we suggested in our preview of Tuesday’s oral argument in Ross v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:39 pm
Doyle appealed, and Ms. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:27 am
Under LLC Law § 702’s standard for dissolution as pronounced by the Second Department in the 1545 Ocean Avenue case, and under First Department case law (Doyle v Icon and more recently, Barone v Sowers) holding that a non-controlling member’s exclusion from management by itself does not constitute a valid claim for LLC dissolution, it’s difficult to see how the sparse allegations in the Koch petition could survive a motion to dismiss. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
Doyle for not speaking on his behalf at the September 2002 independent review board meeting. . . . [read post]
