Search for: "Dragon Products, Ltd." Results 41 - 60 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court New Mexico: Non-practicing plaintiff may not obtain discovery concerning future products under ‘Accelerated market entry’ damages theory: STC.UNM v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm by Eric Schweibenz
., Ltd. of Korea, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California (collectively, “LG”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain light-emitting diodes (“LEDs”) and products containing same that infringe U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, Samsung LED Co., Ltd. of Korea, and Samsung LED America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (collectively, “Samsung”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, sell within the U.S. after importation and/or offer to sell within the U.S. after importation certain light-emitting diodes (“LEDs”) and products containing same that infringe U.S. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Egg World, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Parties choose ACR, TTAB finds SOLARIN not confusingly similar to SOLARCAINE for sun/tanning products: Schering-Plough HealthCare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am by Marie Louise
Soda Pop (Public Knowledge) Copyright Tribunal: new regime gets first outing: Archive Media Publishing Ltd v MCPS (The 1709 Blog) Media content: Senior citizens front and centre? [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Emami Ltd (Spicy IP) IPASI ‘Intellectual Property Association of South India’ comes into being (Spicy IP) Dr. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Pfizer starts R&D in China after IPR in China challenges (IP Dragon) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IP Dragon) Intellectual Property Bank in Taiwan and China (but very different) (IP Dragon) On counterfeit liquor and wine (IP Dragon) The lay-out of the Magic Kingdom in Shanghai wrapped up in a trade secret (IP Dragon) Tsingtao Beer China’s well known trademark (IP Dragon) China: Do just one thing. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm by Marie Louise
(Patently-O) District Court E D Pennsylvania: References to patents in website’s “terms of use” and online product manuals do not constitute false marking: Hollander v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm by Marie Louise
IPOff Ltd (PatLit) Do we trivialise inventors, inventions and Government ministers? [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
(IP Osgoode) China IP Dragon checks international clothes market in Beijing: ‘Waterbedding’ effect of trademark enforcement (IP Dragon) Unoriginal trademarks unpopular in Quanzhou. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am by Marie Louise
(IP Dragon) Taking the IP high road: Baidu faces the music (China Hearsay) Youku takes the IP high road (China Hearsay) ZTE vs. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Ohio: Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute are unconstitutional even if considered civil or civil-criminal hybrid: Unique Product Solutions, Limited v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard)   Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:18 pm by Apeng
(IP Whiteboard) (Patentology) (ipwars) Northern District of Ohio: Qui Tam provision found unconstitutional: Unique Product Solutions Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd and Röhlig Belgium NV and C? [read post]