Search for: "Dukes v. Dukes" Results 41 - 60 of 3,925
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023,  Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:09 am by INFORRM
On 15 June 2023 Fancourt J, handed down judgment  in the case of Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 10:17 am by Michael Heise
Arti Rai (Duke) et al. take up this challenge in a recent paper, Molecular Diagnostics Patenting after Mayo v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
On 8 December 2023, judgment was handed down in The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2023] EWHC 3120 (KB). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am by centerforartlaw
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
There was also a hearing in the case of Price v Newsquest Media Group. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
IPSO 19498-23 Newman v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19587-23 Ward v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19768-23 Bliss v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20285-23 Khan v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20455-23 Chafe v Knutsford Guardian, 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
. 'Duke' Ealey,” a 1939 graduate of the Howard Law School. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am by centerforartlaw
In AWF v Goldsmith, the US Supreme Court clarified that not all works which add “new expression, meaning, or message”[15] will be considered ‘transformative’ by the law, since this would conflict with the copyright holder’s “exclusive right to prepare derivative works,” effectively rendering it useless. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
There was also a case management hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Daedone v BBC. [read post]