Search for: "Dupont"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2023, 3:21 am
" The Board found under the sixth DuPont factor that "the cited mark is laudatory and conceptually weak, but is still presumed valid and enforceable under Section 2(d). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 7:39 am
" It agreed with the Board's conclusion that "a likelihood of confusion between the marks could not exist as a matter of law, even when taking all of the other DuPont factors to weigh in favor of opposer. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
"The Board found DuPont factors 9-12 to be neutral. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:12 am
The Board found the remaining DuPont factors to be neutral. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
Deeming the first DuPont factor to be dispositive, the Board granted Applicant Critical Role, LLC's motion for summary judgment, dismissing Opposer's Monster Energy's Section 2(d) claim. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 4:13 am
Trek also challenged the Board's weighing of the DuPont factors. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am
DuPont came to the Supreme Court this summer, asking the justices to weigh in. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Applying the DuPont factors, the TTAB dismissed Trek’s opposition, finding insufficient evidence of likely confusion. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 7:13 am
Case Name Issue 1 Benthin A 2(a) deceptiveness 2 Budge B excusable neglect 3 Converse C 2(a) false connection 4 DuPont D 2(e)(2) 5 Stone Lion E 2(e)(3) 6 Morton-Norwich F 2(d) 7 Newbridge Cutlery G 2(f) 8 Notre Dame H consumer sophistication 9 Pioneer I 2(e)(4) 10 Spirits Int'l J 2(e)(5) Read comments and post your comment here. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:09 am
DuPont disagreed. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 3:45 am
The remaining DuPont factors were deemed neutral.Balancing the relevant DuPont factors, the Board found confusion unlikely, and so it dismissed the opposition. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:29 pm
As reported by DelawareOnline.com, “[j]ust before midnight Saturday, police responded to a reported shooting in the parking lot of a strip mall at 36334 Dupont Blvd. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:52 am
" As to its services, Applicants argued that because there is no per se rule that restaurant services and wine are related under the second DuPont factor, the USPTO must show “something more” to demonstrate relatedness. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 3:38 am
" Therefore, this DuPont factor weighed against a finding of likelihood of confusion. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:35 am
TTABlogger comment: The Board declared the 4th DuPont factor - the lack of overlap in channels of trade - to be neutral, but it seems to me it should weigh in favor of applicant. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:56 am
" Therefore, the second and third DuPont factors weigh "heavily" in favor of an affirmance of the refusal. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:31 am
Lawyers for AJC, Rome newspaper urge judge to rule state law says financial terms are public record NEWS By Zachary Hansen and Drew Kann 2 hours ago Lawyers for DuPont argued in court Monday that the company paid more to settle a toxic contamination case in North Georgia than it […] The post DuPont lawyer: Release of Rome PFAS deal could imperil other settlements appeared first on Robbins Firm. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
TTABlogger comment: In this otherwise mundane decision, the Board's expansion of the 11th duPont factor apparently carried it over the precedential finish line. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:11 am
" Because the commercial impression engendered by KIST is significantly different from the commercial impression created by SUNKIST, and the appearance, sound and connotation are only superficially similar, the first DuPont factor weighs against likelihood of confusion.Finally, the Board found the lack of evidence of actual confusion -- despite the fact that the parties have sold their carbonated sodas in the same geographic areas and through the same retailers since 2000 --… [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 8:18 am
Today, Seeger Weiss represents Vermont and Maine in litigation against 3M and DuPont for pollution of the states’ land and water with the PFAS “forever chemicals” and numerous other states and public entities in PCB and other environmental contamination litigation. [read post]
