Search for: "Dyke v. Dyke"
Results 41 - 60
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2018, 5:55 am
On appeal, Thrivent relied primarily on Van Dyke v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Clicklaw Blog 2.Van Dyke Injury Law Blog 3. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
Cayetano and Hawai'i v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
Van Dyke, 643 F. 2d 992, 993-994 (CA4 1981); United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:20 pm
Of course, Dyke was discussing the discovery of criminal activity, not the discernment of moral proclivity. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
The post DYKES ON BIKES No Longer Idling After Matal v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am
But they conveniently forget that America, after a less than promising start marred by the likes of Dred Scott v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:51 am
In Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 6:12 am
The opinion is styled, Robert Garner; dba Kustom Kolors Boatworks, Ex Rel, et al v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:37 am
The court also denied the employer’s motion as to the employee’s retaliation claim, which was based on her alleged constructive discharge (Ellingsworth v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
And, unlike the Dykes on Bikes case, where substantial evidence was made of record to show the claimed mark non-disparaging at the time of registration, the same kind of evidence was not produced by Mr. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Not a coincidence that Dykes w/ Bikes was rejected, or that Heeb was rejected, but Redskins was approved and a 50-page federal opinion defends it. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Lee v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
Implicit in Tam’s argument seems to be that trademark owners have messages but infringers don’t – except that Tam also says one of his objectives is to prevent a racist band from calling itself the Slants.From Lemley’s amicus brief: Dykes on Bikes wants to control commercialization of the mark. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:45 am
As VC readers know (see Eugene’s post here), the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of Lee v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:57 pm
The band, like Dykes on Bikes®, intentionally chose a name containing a slur to reappropriate the term. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:19 am
” Springwood Associates v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
” The court thus distinguishes Walker v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:29 pm
Ontario family law firm Russell Alexander was pleased to announce that law student Amelia Rodin won the firm’s Client Service Award, and blogged about the recent decision in Jackson v Mayerle, resulting from a 36-day child custody trial, and what the trial circumstances say about the parents. [read post]
