Search for: "E B C I Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 1,924
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The three most-consulted French-language decisions were: Gestion George Kyritsis inc. c. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Apr. 28, 2020) ("[C]laims involving sexual orientation … are examples of matters that qualify as being highly sensitive and of a personal nature. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
These Wands factors include: (A) the breadth of the claims; (B) the nature of the invention; (C) the state of the prior art; (D) the level of one of ordinary skill; (E) the level of predictability in the art; (F) the amount of direction provided by the inventor; (G) the existence of working examples; and (H) the quantity of experimentation needed to make or use the invention based on the content of the disclosure. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am by Adeline Chong
The majority in this case recognised four possible grounds: (a) presence in the foreign territory; (b) filing of a claim or counterclaim; (c) voluntary submission; and (d) agreement to submit to the foreign jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
” Kasirer J.: “I would dismiss the appeal … In sum, in respect of both the mental health and the after-the-fact evidence, I see no reviewable errors in the jury charge and, on these points, I would adopt the majority reasons of van Rensburg J.A. as my own, without reserve. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Sorel-Tracy (Ville de) c. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 5:04 am by gA
Causo estupor una medida de no innovar despachada a su favor por el juez Bustos Fierro en Córdoba. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:15 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
§§ 164.502(a) and 164.530(c) by: Impermissibly disclosing the PHI of two identified patients to the film crew and other staff of “NY Med;” Failing appropriately and reasonably to safeguard its patients’ PHI from disclosure during the filming of “NY Med” on its premises; and Failing to implement policies, procedures, and practices to protect the privacy of the filming of  the television show. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In this case, the Ponzi scheme presumption allows the Court to presume that BLMIS made the initial transfers with actual intent to defraud because Madoff has admitted to operating a Ponzi scheme.32 In addition, the court noted that prior decisions of the District Court in the BLMIS case established that section 546(e) does not apply to transfers [read post]