Search for: "E.I. Dupont De Nemours " Results 41 - 60 of 211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Du Pont de Nemours, Louisville Works, 346 NLRB No. 113 (2016) and clarified that an employer does not have an affirmative duty to bargain over employment actions that are consistent with its past practice. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Adam Santucci
DuPont de Nemours, Louisville Works, which had overturned 50 years of precedent. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:00 pm by Mark Theodore and Joshua Fox
The Board expressly overruled a year-old decision in E.I. du Point De Nemours, 364 NLRB No. 113 (2016) (DuPont), and reinstated the law that had existed for years. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
DuPont de Nemours and Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:56 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
DuPont De Nemours & Company, the plaintiffs filed an FLSA collective action seeking compensation for unpaid time spent donning and doffing uniforms and safety gear and performing other activities before and after shifts. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:46 am by James Hastings
   In cases where it is alleged that the Applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will look to the factors for likelihood of confusion set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:46 am by James Hastings
   In cases where it is alleged that the Applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will look to the factors for likelihood of confusion set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
”) Anticipation/Obviousness: E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch A new Supreme Court justice will likely be in place by the end of April, although the Trump edition is unlikely to substantially shake-up patent law doctrine in the short term. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Substantive Patent Law: Newly filed petition in Merck & Cie v. [read post]