Search for: "EC v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2011, 6:35 pm
That definition is broader than the EC’s definition, in that it is not as firmly anchored to the 1-100nm criterion. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:54 am
eDate Advertising GmbH v X: Martinez and another v MGN Ltd; (Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10); [2011] WLR (D) 330 “Under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 a person who considered that his privacy rights had been infringed by content placed online on an internet website had the option of bringing an action either before the courts of the member state in which the publisher of that content was… [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:45 pm
In Case C-195/04 Commission v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:07 pm
The post An EC Communication on SEPs – Not More Not Less appeared first on Antitrust Law Blog. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:24 pm
Most of the judgment in Joined Cases C-231/06 to C-233/06 Office national des pensions v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:27 am
The High Court decision in Alberta v Katanga dealt with two separate questions that are of interest. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:17 am
This case concerns subsidiary protection (known domestically as “humanitarian protection”) under EU Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive). [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
Case C-281/02, Owusu v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:18 pm
The Court of Justice handed down an important judgment in Case C-164/07 James Wood v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
The Times today reported a decision of Mr Justice Plender in the case of Stephen Cooper v Attorney-General (Judgment of 30 September 2008) in the English High Court (The Times, 7 October 2008, 'When judicial error in EC law gives rise to damages'). [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:10 am
The Court recalled that Article 56 §1 EC lays down a general prohibition on restrictions on movements of capital between member States (see, Case C-112/05 Commission v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:02 pm
Defendants thus appeared to be nothing more than sellers of fungible goods in a complex series of transactions that were directed by foreign gangs.The decision is European Community v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:20 am
McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-434/09); [2011] WLR (D) 153 “Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC was not applicable to a European Union citizen who had never exercised their right of free movement, who had always resided in a member state of which they were a national and who was also a national of another member state. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
Given too that the EC seems to have a policy to respond with formal observations to most reference cases there may be some Member State reliance that the EC will be dealing with them anyway. [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 2:37 am
As for a system of import licenses, such a system is in principle contrary to Article 28 EC, which precludes the application in intra-Community trade of national provisions which require, even as a pure formality, import licences or any other similar procedure (Case 124/81 Commission v United Kingdom, paragraph 9, and Case C‑304/88 Commission v Belgium, paragraph 9; see also Case C‑212/03 Commission v France, paragraph 16, and Case E-1/94 Restamark,… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:37 am
Vicoplus SC PUH v v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid; BAM Vermeer Contracting sp. zoo v Same; Olbek Industrial Services sp. zoo v Same (Case C-307/09 to C-309/09); [2011] WLR (D) 46 “Articles 56FEU and 57FEU of the FEU Treaty did not preclude a member state from making the hiring out on its territory of workers who were Polish nationals subject to the obtaining of a work permit during the transitional period provided for in paragraph 2… [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 9:02 am
Consequently, the Commission can institute proceedings on the basis of Article 226 EC against that member State. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 2:21 pm
It is for the member States to establish a system of legal remedies to ensure that individual rights under EC law can be enforced (Case C-50/00 P Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:59 pm
In this case, Azko Nobel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:40 pm
Commission (T-424/04), in which it ruled that Italy's favorable tax treatment for special investment funds violates state aid rule of the EC Treaty. [read post]
