Search for: "ECUADORIAN PLAINTIFFS"
Results 41 - 60
of 217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 1:44 pm
Chevron charged that miscarriages of justice in the Ecuadorian courts and participation by Ecuador in the plaintiffs' fraud violated its rights. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:13 am
Unlike the original, the order is not believed to be accompanied by backing vocals in Ecuadorian Spanish. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs From Enforcing Non-U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
At least in politicized cases like this one, where President Correa, who controls the Ecuadorian judiciary, has made his interest in the outcome clear, Ecuadorian judgments do not merit recognition in U.S. courts. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs From Enforcing Non-U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:44 pm
I mention this because of recent developments in the massive class action lawsuit filed by a group of Ecuadorian plaintiffs against Chevron over contamination of the Amazon rainforest basin. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:05 am
So what would the Ecuadorians’ attorneys try? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
He says that a puntive damage award—if the Ecuadorian judgment is construed as punitive—may violate Brazil’s ordre public. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
There is no discussion of choice of law in the case — the Court of Appeals applies New York law throughout without discussion of the nationality of the plaintiffs, where the relevant events occurred, whether the law of the plaintiffs’ domicile was the same or different. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Patton Boggs LLP represents the plaintiffs and would like to continue to do so. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:31 am
The facts are somewhat complicated but can be summarized as follows: Plaintiffs held a majority interest in an Ecuadorian company which sought funding from a Mexican company, Telemex Mexico, controlled by billionaire Carlos Slim. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Chevron, which had sued some of the plaintiffs and their lawyers in New York, issued a subpoena to the Weinberg Group for documents. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:23 am
Now the Ecuadorian plaintiffs have commenced additional enforcement proceedings in Canada. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
” “Newly discovered facts” refers to facts which existed at the time the foreign judgment was obtained but were not known to the defendant” and could not have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence. 7 Douglass Cassel’s Symposium post summarizes the nature of the fraud allegations raised by Chevron in the U.S. litigation as follows: As I have detailed elsewhere, the Ecuadorian proceedings amounted to a fraud in which some (not all) of… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
(This conclusion is even stronger where the plaintiffs orchestrated or directly participated in the foreign fraud.) [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
[JURIST] Ecuadorian plaintiffs seeking to collect on a judgment against Chevron Corp [corporate website; JURIST news archive] over Amazon pollution on Wednesday filed a collection action [complaint, PDF] in Ontario's Superior Court of Justice [official website]. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:27 pm
More interestingly, the Ecuadorian plaintiffs are attempting to get an Ontario court to seize Chevron assets. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:41 am
But in fact, the evidence indicates that plaintiffs acted in collusion with the Ecuadorian court. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:25 am
Ecuadorian Plaintiffs are seeking to enforce the $18.2 Ecuadorian judgment against Chevron in Canada. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:07 pm
Ever since the Invictus Memo was released to the public we knew that the Ecuadorian Plaintiffs were considering twenty-seven different countries to enforce the $18.2 Ecuadorian judgment against Chevron. [read post]
