Search for: "EDDINGS v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 13,500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Lind eds. 2014). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:47 pm
Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶4.25[6], at 4–272 (2d ed. 1982)). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:00 am
Part V concludes. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:51 am
From yesterday's Ohio Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Parsons v Atkinson, heard 26 and 27 February 2024 (Farbey J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Wilson v… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:45 pm
1.SCOTUS will hear Fischer v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
” Perkins v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm
The Federal Circuit confirmed that “WesternGeco displac[ed] Power Integrations. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Holder and Rucho v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:13 am
But the Alberta Court of Appeal cleared things up this week, saying the lower court decision “exceed[ed] the limits on the power of the judiciary to change the law. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives) in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
