Search for: "EDWARDS v. SMITH" Results 41 - 60 of 699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
 On 8 November 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
The keynote speaker, UK Information Commissioner John Edwards will be joined by Professor Victoria Nash of the Oxford Internet Institute, Professor Lilian Edwards of Newcastle University and the Ada Lovelace Institute, Maurice Frankel of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, Alan Payne KC and Aaron Moss of 5 Essex Court and Stewart Room, NADPO’s president. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Carolyn Pepper of Reed Smith LLP writes for the Press Gazette on the application of libel law to ‘deep fakes,’ which are digital impersonations of well-known individuals. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Susan Landau
Recall that a decade ago, in the wake of the Edward Snowden disclosures, Silicon Valley and Washington were very much on the outs with each other. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
Joseph Kennedy, the first Chairman of the SEC, had a saying: “No honest business need fear the SEC. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection John Edwards, the Information Commissioner, has opened an investigation into concerns that the Ministry of Justice itself was unlawfully processing barristers’ personal data. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]