Search for: "EEOC v. Group Health Plan" Results 41 - 60 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
For example, Dorel Juvenile Group Inc. agreed to pay a $14,563.50 penalty and return a total of $145,635 in tobacco surcharges to employees who originally had to pay them (Acosta v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
.: CSIS will host a conversation with Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Independence of military’s plan, report banning transgender individuals from service questioned. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am by Lorene Park
The court also held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act provided no relief to the company owner as continuing to employ the funeral director would not substantially burden his religious exercise (EEOC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 2:36 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Employers should keep this ruling on their radar when considering medical testing in the job application process. *** In EEOC v. [read post]