Search for: "ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 41 - 60
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 1:41 pm
In reference to the use of electronic signals, Justice Scalia claims these would still be subject to a Katz analysis. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 10:18 am
Related Cases: Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
” The State Department explained that “[d]isclosure of [the documents] . . . risk[ed] circumvention of the law because terrorists . . . could use [them to formulate strategies for] conceal[ing] derogatory information, provid[ing] fraudulent information, or otherwise circumvent[ing] the security checks . . . . [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:50 am
Evidently, the Justice Department has been asking judges outside the Second Circuit to reject this ruling. [read post]
Bypassing the telecoms: 'Stingrays' allow direct government phone surveillance with little oversight
9 Mar 2013, 1:41 pm
Alan Butler, Appellate Advocacy Counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said the legal standards for using stingrays are not clear but thinks they have constitutional privacy implications. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
Katz‘s emphasis on privacy served as a foundation for the later spatial emphasis in Fourth Amendment law, as in California v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:11 am
Many privacy groups, such as Electronic Privacy Information Center, and human rights groups have opposed the CLOUD Act agreements. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:11 am
Many privacy groups, such as Electronic Privacy Information Center, and human rights groups have opposed the CLOUD Act agreements. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm
We were joined by the Brennan Center for Justice, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, FreedomWorks, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the Rutherford Institute. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Any of this information could conceivably be of use to a U.S. firm, but in practice it is highly unlikely that any such information would make it off the Department of Justice’s evidence servers. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 5:53 pm
We also joined coalition comments compiled by the Center for Democracy & Technology, as well as a second set of coalition comments organized by the Brennan Center for Justice in response to a DHS notice required by the Privacy Act. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:42 am
Thankfully, this month, the US Department of Justice filed a lawsuit to do just that. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
The case is Sorrell, et al., v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm
The security team then forwarded the complaint, image, and Susan_14’s profile information—email address, home address, and date that the Playstation account was opened—to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
That was the ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Department of Justice The Pointless Redaction Award: Mueller Report The Repeat Winner Award: Atlanta Mayor’s Office The Unnecessary Fee Award: Horry County, South Carolina The Surveillance for You, Privacy for Us Award: Ring Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Department of Justice The Pointless Redaction Award: Mueller Report The Repeat Winner Award: Atlanta Mayor’s Office The Unnecessary Fee Award: Horry County, South Carolina The Surveillance for You, Privacy for Us Award: Ring Inc. [read post]
31 May 2015, 12:03 am
The same goes for other still-secret bulk surveillance programs under Section 215, the latest evidence of which came in a recently released oversight report by the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG). [read post]
