Search for: "EPOS DEVELOPMENT LTD."
Results 41 - 60
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2017, 11:45 pm
| Trader keeps the [good] faith in a spare part in trademark doublebill | Book Review: The Informal Economy in Developing Nations - Hidden Edge of Innovation? [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 6:50 am
FKB and S/B alleged that Abbott Laboratories (Bermuda) Ltd (“Abbott Bermuda”), the applicant for the PCT application which resulted in the European patent, was not entitled to claim priority from a US application, because it was not the successor in title to the applicants for the US application who were, as US law required at the time, the inventors. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
During the discussion it was pointed out that under the EPO approach, the definition of the problem to be solved changes depending on the closest prior art. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
| Around the IP Blogs | Biosimilars battle in clearing the way - Fujifilm v AbbVie continues | Book review: Maintenance time and the industry development of patentsNever Too Late 129 [week ending on Sunday 1 January] | Happy Public Domain Day! [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
No problem – here is the 130th edition of Never Too Late.Book review: Maintenance time and the industry development of patentsInternKat Tian reviewed Dr. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:11 am
., Ltd and Others v AbbVie Biotechnology Limited [2016] EWHC 3383 (Ch). [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
& 3 Ors v Chocosuisse Union Des Fabricants Suisses Never too late 89 [week ending on Sunday 27 March] – Cricket and copyright in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Anor v Tixdaq Ltd & Anor | Are business models simply jargon? [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
El-Moslimany https://t.co/D7hxhkiOlM -> Reports of DMCA Abuse Likely Exaggerated https://t.co/7mEohaKQbE -> Privacy injunction lifted when info was published on Internet PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 393 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-04-18 https://t.co/qi7DnFpSKe -> Trade Matters In 2016; This May Help You Understand Why -> Canada Cannot Miss the Boat on the TPP -> Netflix enrages Canada by actually following through with VPN crackdown plans… [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
The decision could easily have been justified by reference to EPO case law, but interestingly, the BGH did not reference EPO case law here, but has done so in other cases regarding user interface designs, e.g. in the “image stream” decision.That the Federal Court of Justice would reference EPO decisions in the image stream decision is remarkable because this decision is arguably the most important departure of A big nose helps for onceGerman practice from the… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:09 am
It is open to IP experts with an appetite for influencing the development of law and policy at the national and international level. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 2:38 am
| Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation | Lord Neuberger's most difficult case | US Senate passes Trade Secrets Act Never too late 89 [week ending on Sunday 27 March] – Cricket and copyright in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Anor v Tixdaq Ltd & Anor | Are business models simply jargon? [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
Yes, explains Arnold J in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Anor v Tixdaq Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 575 (Ch). [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:00 am
The Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) had challenged the European equivalent of the patent (which had in any case been objected to by the EPO) but had not opposed the equivalent Indian patent. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
| US trade secrets | Trends in IP Data | EPO's new Chief Economist | GIFs and copyright | Katcall for new positions in the IPKat team | Star Wars IP.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme | Ethics in IP |… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
| US trade secrets | Trends in IP Data | EPO's new Chief Economist | GIFs and copyright | Katcall for new positions in the IPKat team | Star Wars IP.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme | Ethics in IP |… [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 1:00 am
As a result, the patents were revoked.This Kat did not manage to spot anything unorthodox in how the judge approached sufficiency, or in his application of the tests as developed over the years both by the courts in the United Kingdom and by the EPO Boards of Appeal.As always, however, the IPKat would like to hear what readers think, particularly those practising in the life sciences, or at least the subset which has not succumbed to apoplexy upon seeing their beloved subject… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
Never too late 75 [week ending on Sunday 6 December] – BHG on blocking injunctions | IP in Universities | Sweden on blocking injunctions | Canadian musings on patents | US Senate and trade secret reform | Chinese IP Courts | G1/14 referral and Article 108 EPC | PACE procedure (Procedure for Accelerated Conduct of Examination) ant the EPO | Greekat and trade mark partenalism | EPO Boards of Appeal tell AC: we were never… [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
What is interesting to this Kat is that of course it would have been open to Pfizer/Warner-Lambert to go to the EPO and seek the same amendment using the central limitation procedure. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
* AIPPI Congress Report 3: Trying to resolve the global puzzle of inventor remuneration * AIPPI Congress Report 4: Trade mark sessions come in all shapes and sizes ****************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 68 [week ending on Sunday 18 October] – Hedge funds, pharma patents and thorny issues: a word on IPRs following Lialda | Battistelli v EPO Enlarged Board | Flynn Pharma… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:32 pm
Critics say the agreement benefits developed countries at the cost of developing countries. [read post]
