Search for: "ESPOSITO V. ESPOSITO" Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Here's the abstract:In its judgment of 3 February 2012 in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy: Greece intervening), the International Court of Justice has considered the relationship between jus cogens and the rule of State immunity. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:46 am
Joseph BonelliNASSAU COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawTenant's Failure to Pay Base Rent Cannot Be Basis for Landlord to Terminate LeaseTrust Under Last Will and Testament of D'Esposito v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:12 am
City of New York KINGS COUNTYCivil PracticePosition That Suit Sounds in Simple Negligence Is Taken as Withdrawal of Malpractice ClaimD'Esposito v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:06 am
Esposito SUFFOLK COUNTYReal PropertyAttorney Denied Summary Judgment on Allegation Of Conspiracy and Forgery; Depositions Directed Michiels v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Bob Ambrogi
Esposito, a lawyer who has been general counsel to several companies. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:34 pm by Colin O'Keefe
  - Seattle attorney Trent Dykes of DLA Piper on the firm's blog, The Venture Alley Lindo v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiffs’ allegations, inter alia, that Weiss failed to ascertain the status of the foreclosure action before recommending a strategy, and that his proposed strategy of focusing on the pursuit of a mortgage modification was “futile” in light of the then upcoming foreclosure auction, were sufficient, if true, for a factfinder to determine that Weiss offered negligent advice (see Esposito v Noto, 132 AD3d 944, 945-946; Coccia v Liotti, 70 AD3d… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" (Mennerich v Esposito, 4 AD3d 399, 400 [2d Dept 2004] [quoting Larkin Trucking Co. v Lisbon Tire Mart, 185 AD2d 614, 615 (4th Dept 1992)]; see also Gonzalez v Beacon Terminal Assocs., L.P., 48 AD3d 518, 519 [2d Dept 2008].) [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
Bradshaw, 292 A.D.2d 84, 86–87, 739 N.Y.S.2d 421).Matter of D'Esposito v Kepler, 14 AD3d 509, 788 N.Y.S.2d 169 (A.D. 2 Dept.2005)            In Matter of Raymond v Raymond, 174 A.D.3d 625, 107 N.Y.S.3d 433, 2019 N.Y. [read post]