Search for: "Economou v. Little"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
-NAP exhibits all of the weaknesses and missed opportunities that has marked the NAP process for many developed states: it focuses on outward conduct and pays little attention to the human rights effects of economic activity within the United States; it is grounded in the prerogatives of executive command; it provides little assessment of the legal and remedial framework of the United States and its relationship to managing business conduct; and most regrettably, so… [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:13 am
The decision indicates that commentators might have been a little premature in observing that the UPC was establishing itself as a patentee-friendly court. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Jack’s paper was called “Market Failure and the Economic Case for a Mandatory Disclosure System. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:38 am
The U.S. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
Last week, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued its decision in Catholic Charities v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
At this point, little can be [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm
National Rifle Association v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am
Still, issuing this pronouncement before interviewing the jurors seems little more than wishcasting. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
So Russia wants Ukraine back in the USSR, while Ukrainians insist that they can get by with a little help from our friends. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm
“I think that (the city) should do a little bit more. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Fortunately, at least one county employee thought that breaking the law must be a little more complicated than that, and this person went to Breaking Through News to blow the whistle. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:42 pm
Even a little. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:01 am
As you may know, applicants must also prove that they are economically disadvantaged, though the requirements to qualify as such are a little more objective. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:49 pm
She also holds a doctorate in Law and was a professor at the University of Louvain.Sue Willman (Deighton Pierce Glynn Solicitors): Sue established DPG’s public law and human rights team and has represented the applicant in JN v The United Kingdom before the ECtHR. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:59 am
Su v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm
” But it is a little hard to see how these matters truly inform the test under clause 2(1)(c). [read post]