Search for: "Edelstein v. Edelstein"
Results 41 - 51
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 9:02 am
The general rule was set out in the case of Edelstein v Edelstein (1952 3 SA 1 A) by the then-Appellate Division (now the Supreme Court of Appeal). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm
SCHWARTZ, SIMON, EDELSTEIN, CELSO & ZITOMER, L.L.C., App. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
Haushalter of the Pittsburgh office of Margolis Edelstein for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 3:45 pm
In the case of Green Street Associates v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:11 am
Edelstein v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
The defendant established that the plaintiff would be unable to prove that he would have been successful in the forfeiture action but for the alleged negligence (see Simmons v Edelstein, 32 AD3d 464, 465; Lichtenstein v Barenbaum, 23 AD3d 440; Edwards v Haas, Greenstein, Samson, Cohen & Gerstein, P.C., 17 AD3d 517, 519). [read post]
5 May 2009, 1:50 am
The justices, in Sanders v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 1:09 am
Natasha Sedunova
KINGS COUNTYAlternative Dispute Resolution
Arbitration Award Did Not Fall Within Proscribed Sanctions; Motion to Confirm Award Granted
Edelstein v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 11:42 am
Edelstein v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
In its 24-page opinion in Marie Miller Century 21 Alliance Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:03 am
In making its determination, the Court analyzed the motion using the five factors set forth in Kaufman v. [read post]
