Search for: "Edwards v. Federal Express Corporation"
Results 41 - 60
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 1 February 2023, the Federal Court of New South Wales gave judgment on meaning for the publications identified in the amended statement of claim in Russell v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2023] FCA 38. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
The change effectively isolates small business income and taxes it at the same rate as corporate income, another example of a workaround for the federal SALT deduction cap for pass-through businesses. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was immediately appointed as receiver. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:20 pm
Since then, a steady stream of international agreements further entrenched the power of corporations to impede free expression by restricting access to culture, content, and criticism. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Ignited by news reports in 2005, eight years before Edward Snowden’s revelations blew the lid off illegal and unconstitutional domestic spying in 2013, mounting concerns around the world about the threat to free expression made 2015 a watershed year in the battle to restore privacy. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
Defendant was targeted as a potential terrorist and became the subject of an ongoing investigation by the New York Joint Terrorism Task Force (“JTTF”) comprised of Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) agents and New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) detectives. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
The preliminary injunction (Google Order) was granted by District Court Judge Edward Davila. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
Music v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
A federal grand jury indicted Phillips on all counts. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
Edwards convinced investors to buy payphones and lease them back to ETS for what Edwards claimed would be a guaranteed profit of approximately 14 percent per year. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
Rumsfeld (2004), that it could not do so lightly, without clearly expressing its intent. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
The court addressed who owned what copyright in computer software developed by a service provider, but where the express contractual provisions left a lacuna as to IPR ownership.Annsley Merelle Ward reviews the ex tempore decision of Mr Justice Carr in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
The constitutional applicability and operability of Alberta’s Limitation of Actions Act, as incorporated into federal law by s. 39(1) of the Federal Courts Act, is not at issue. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Between 1997 and 2006, Ventures entered into long-term net sub-leases with Waste Management, Inc. for a waste transfer station; with News Corporation for a colorizing plant for the New York Post; and with Federal Express for a package transfer facility. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
Canada On 23 January 2023, judgement was handed down on a summary basis in Bordeaux Developments Corporation v Hu, 2023 ABKB 44. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Nette,[70] in an effort to avoid the Latin expression, described the Smithers standard as “a contributing cause that is not trivial or insignificant. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
[Cross-reference to Lemley and Pooley, California Restrictive Employment Covenants after Edwards discussing Edwards v. [read post]
