Search for: "Elliott v. Day"
Results 41 - 60
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2016, 9:32 am
Olson v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:34 pm
” Five days later, a police cruiser from a nearby town was similarly vandalized. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm
The Privacy and Cybersecurity Law blog has a post on the decision in R v Elliott 2016 ONCJ 35 which concerns allegations of criminal harassment on Twitter. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 12:56 pm
Employers in Pennsylvania suffered a major blow, when the Impairment Rating provisions of Act 57, were invalidated by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the 2017 case of Protz v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:51 am
Todd v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 4:13 pm
Image courtesy of Flickr by Elliott Brown. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
(Update) The Court of Appeal heard an oral application for permission to appeal in the case of Rufus v Elliott. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:49 am
Ohio v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:53 am
Pullman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 8:49 am
Further, the case of Sheppard v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 8:49 am
Further, the case of Sheppard v. [read post]
Undisclosed Settlement Reached Before Jury Verdict of $2 Million in Negligent Treatment of Pneumonia
24 Jun 2021, 8:30 am
Babbitt v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Elliott served as a prominent delegate to the 1868 South Carolina State Constitutional Convention and was later elected to the South Carolina General Assembly. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:53 am
Berjian, D.O., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 12:51 pm
" And the tie breaker four days later was, Merrill v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm
” Other notable: Derek Elliott Tice v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
As to a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker, the Court of Appeals, in its March 22, 2001 decision in Kelly v Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, [decided with Elliott v City of New York], said that: 1.The courts may not modify such a determination if substantial evidence supports it; and 2.A court must uphold an administrative penalty unless it finds that it is so disproportionate to the… [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 3:56 am
Judge Stallman, after commenting that Rivera failed to demonstrate the relevance of the Certificate insofar as this case was concerned, indicated that even if it were relevant, such a certificate does not exempt a civil servant from administrative discipline.As to a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker, the Court of Appeals, in its March 22, 2001 decision in Kelly v Safir, [decided with… [read post]
