Search for: "Employees' Retirement v. Brown" Results 41 - 60 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
An “out of the box” pick for the California Supreme Court In 2014, California Governor Jerry Brown nominated Kruger, then just 38 years old, to serve on the California Supreme Court when Associate Justice Joyce Kennard retired. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
That agreement changed the health benefits of active employees and Westchester County decided that such changes also affected retired employees. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
That agreement changed the health benefits of active employees and Westchester County decided that such changes also affected retired employees. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
That agreement changed the health benefits of active employees and Westchester County decided that such changes also affected retired employees. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
That agreement changed the health benefits of active employees and Westchester County decided that such changes also affected retired employees. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
That agreement changed the health benefits of active employees and Westchester County decided that such changes also affected retired employees. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
That agreement changed the health benefits of active employees and Westchester County decided that such changes also affected retired employees. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 11:43 pm
Northwestern University, No. 19-1401, to address the pleading standard that applies to breach of fiduciary duty claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing People v Brown, 115 AD3d 155, affirmed 25 NY3d 247, the Appellate Division opined that the plain language of Retirement and Social Security Law §501(25) is clear and unambiguous. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Fraser v. [read post]