Search for: "Energy Resources Group, Inc. v. Energy Resources Corp." Results 41 - 60 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Alfonso Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by D. Daxton White
Ridgewood Energy N Fund Ridgewood Energy O Fund Ridgewood Energy P Fund Ridgewood Energy Q Fund Atlas America Public #14 – 2004 Ltd Bradford Drilling Associates 19, LP Bradford Drilling Associates 23, LP Bradford Drilling Associates 24, LP Bradford Drilling Associates 25, LP Alliance Petroleum Corp 2005 A Alliance Petroleum Corp 2005 B Alliance Petroleum Corp 2006 B Odyssey Residential Realty II, LLC 9% Note CNL Lifestyle… [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott &amp; Kindermann
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
That diversity includes technologies that derive energy from waste, enabling us to harness the power of this underutilized resource. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:40 pm by WIMS
Access a release from environmental groups on the decision (click here). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]