Search for: "English v. Manchester" Results 41 - 60 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB - Read judgment The case of OPQ v BJM addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:25 am
| IPEC no longer London-focuses as IP small claims track reaches courts in Newcastle, Manchester, Cardiff and beyond | Can an employee’s freedom of expression trump their confidentiality obligations? [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Two complaints lodged against a BBC documentary covering the Manchester Arena bombing have been upheld. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 13-24 Romside Place RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 603 (LC)Ninety… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 13-24 Romside Place RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 603 (LC)Ninety… [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has considered whether a cartoon can be defamatory under English law. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project Blog has considered the implementation of the English Courts modernisation. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The NT2 case was the first “delisting order” made by an English court and was, perhaps understandably, the focus of most of the media reporting (for example, the BBC and the Guardian). [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
It’s difficult to comment without a full investigation and a copy of the Swedish study in English. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
R (AR) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police & Anor, heard 21 Nov 2017. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (AR) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police & Anor, heard 21 Nov 2017. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (AR) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police & Anor, heard 21 Nov 2017. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The low number of statements in open court in 2011 is another indication of the declining numbers of libel cases before the English courts. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  Sequel to Manchester v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45: Article 8 ECHR requires Court to consider proportionality before granting any possession order against a home R v Forsyth and Mabey [2011] UKSC 9. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm by Giles Peaker
In the Article 8 defence English case law, the Supreme Court seemed pretty clear on the point, at least as a ‘general rule’, at para 61 of Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] 2 AC 104. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Josh Sturtevant
This is provided by a lesser English club, Ebbsfleet United. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:26 pm by Giles Peaker
Damages should be assessed as per Wallace v Manchester City Council. [read post]