Search for: "Entities I-XX"
Results 41 - 50
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 6:27 am
And finally, of course, as discussed in the last post, Canada could try invoking a GATT Article XX defense, certainly to the Article III:4 claim, but also to the SCM Agreement claim. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm
XX).In other Lewis news, I see that someone finally reissued Lewis's co-authored 1939 book The Personal Heresy: A Controversy, which had long been out of print. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:18 am
SORRY I REAR ENDED YOU” to invite her and her infant son (DOB: 05/XX/2007 and he was a passenger in her vehicle) to this “how miserable can we make her” party. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:27 am
I think it has been pretty obvious from my blogging that I've developed an interest in investment law and disputes over the past year or so. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:50 am
”447 Second, there was no mention in the U.S. submission about a possible GATT Article XX(g) defense by China. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
California legislation regulates privacy and personal information in ways similar to the new 2009 HITECH Act that modifies HIPAA.Reads section 1798.82 of the California Civil Code: (a) Any person or business that conducts business in California, and that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information, shall disclose any breach of the security of the system following discovery or notification of the breach in the security of the data to any resident of California whose… [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:09 pm
In other words, the Party can trust the personnel of selected SOEs in a way it cannot with private entities to carry out its opaque and capricious censorship policies. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 2:12 pm
From what I gather, various private and public entities are already trying it in some areas. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:15 pm
I know it may be politically infeasible, yet still has lots of merits.) [read post]
