Search for: "Erik Hovenkamp"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2019, 8:45 am
Cotter, University of Minnesota Law School, Erik Hovenkamp, Harvard Law School; Yale Law School, and Norman Siebrasse, University of New Brunswick - Fredericton - Faculty of Law are Demystifying Patent Holdup. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
The Competitive Effects of Search Engine Defaults Erik Hovenkamp USC Gould School of Law Abstract In the landmark case U.S. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
Erik Hovenkamp, Harvard Law School and Jorge Lemus, University Of Illinois Urbana Champaign identify Proportional Restraints and the Patent System. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Erik N. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:53 am
In his recent article, Antitrust Economist (and lawyer) Erik Hovenkamp argues that the “right to challenge a patent” should also be an important consideration in antitrust analysis. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 5:00 pm
Hovenkamp, Erik, Challenge Restraints and the Scope of the Patent (November 8, 2016). [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:07 pm
Recent Headlines in the IP World: Victoria Song: Freshly Published Patent Keeps the Dream of an Apple Self-Driving Car Alive (Source: Gizmodo) Michael Rosen: Further Clarity on Patent Eligibility Proposal as Draft Language Emerges (Source: AEI) Julie Verhage and Sridhar Natarajan: Flywheel Hopes to Leave Peloton’s Claims of Patent Infringement in the Dust (Source: Fortune) Jeremy Horwitz: Apple seeks AR Glasses Patent for Hiding Secret Documents at Work (Source: Venture Beat)… [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 8:46 pm
Asay: Artificial Stupidity (Source: SSRN) Erik Hovenkamp: FTC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 2:39 pm
Recent Headlines in the IP World: Paul Fucito: USPTO Announces 2018 Patents for Humanity Winners (Source: USPTO) Alexander Stoklosa: Ferrari Patents Novel Method for Making Turbocharged Engines Sound Better (Source: Car and Driver) Jan Wolfe: Federal Circuit Tosses Wireless Patent Infringement Finding Against Apple (Source: Reuters) Danielle Kirsh: Syneo Receives Patent in China (Source: Medical Design and Outsourcing) David Phelan: Hey, Siri, It’s Me: Apple Patent Teases… [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 6:00 pm
Erik Hovenkamp: Antitrust and Trademark Settlements (Source: SSRN) New Job Postings on Patently-O: Davidson Sheehan LLP Duane Morris LLP Bejin Bieneman, PLC Fiala & Weaver P.L.L.C. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Holbrook: Extraterritoriality and Proximate Cause after WesternGeco (Source: SSRN) Erik Hovenkamp and Prof. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Erik Hovenkamp: Argument is related to strategic delegation literature, which was criticized based on failure to account for renegotiation. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
Bryan and Erik Hovenkamp argue in a 2020 article that antitrust law—which prohibits companies from taking actions that limit competition—has been largely silent about large technology firms’ acquisitions of small startups. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
Hovenkamp ("[P]otential [patent] defendants can do better by forming a litigation cost-sharing agreement: a contractual agreement that divides a member's defense costs among the group when the plaintiff is a PAE, and which requires members to litigate predatory claims to judgment.")The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, by Michael Frakes & Melissa F. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 8:55 am
The "classic" holdup story in the economics literature relates to incomplete contracts or other partial relationships that allow one party to take advantage of an investment by the other to extract rents.You can see the overlap, but the "classic" folks think that patent holdup story doesn't count, because there's no prior negotiation - the party investing has the opportunity to research patents, negotiate beforehand, plan their affairs, etc.In their new article… [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:46 am
Margo Bagley (Emory); Jeremy Bock (Tulane); Dan Burk (UCIrvine); Michael Carrier (Rutgers); Rochelle Dreyfuss (NYU); Samuel Ernst (GGU); William Gallagher (GGU); Shubha Ghosh (Syracuse); Leah Chan Grinvald (Suffolk); Erik Hovenkamp (USC); Mark Lemley (Stanford); Orly Lobel (USC); Brian Love (SCU); Stephen McJohn (Suffolk); Michael Meurer (BU); Shawn Miller (USD); Tyler Ochoa (SCU); Christopher Turoski (Minnesota). = = = = Here, I expect that the Federal Circuit will duck the… [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 6:05 am
Having just finished incorporating a number of helpful comments Herbert Hovenkamp gave me on a forthcoming tying/bundling article (more about that later!) [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm
@ThomasCotter1, Erik Hovenkamp, Norm Siebrasse: Tech switching only leads to patent holdup when, due to path dependence, commitment to tech effects irreversible change in prospective costs or benefits of alternative. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm
@ThomasCotter1, Erik Hovenkamp, Norm Siebrasse: Tech switching only leads to patent holdup when, due to path dependence, commitment to tech effects irreversible change in prospective costs or benefits of alternative. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
(And for those interested, please download my revised response article, which now contains both my original and Hovenkamp’s arguments.) [read post]
