Search for: "Eugene R. Douglas, I"
Results 41 - 60
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
Argument [I.] [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:02 am
(Eugene Volokh) (For an introduction to this series of posts, see here.) [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:49 am
I think this is true, but I can't be completely certain, and, even if I'm certain of the facts, I can't be certain that the jury will agree. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 9:38 am
(Eugene Volokh) Kubert v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Christopher R. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 2:42 pm
Douglas Berman (Sentencing Law & Policy) for the pointer. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
I’d like to begin my commentary on that case by offering a very general comment. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
That was enough for Justices Black, Douglas, and Goldberg to argue in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
I see that Eugene has just blogged on that issue below, so please post any comments relating to the non-Fourth Amendment parts in the thread attached to Eugene’s post.Thanks to Adam J. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
Watson (Georgia), Sonja R. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:11 pm
Douglas wrote what struck me as quite a powerful dissent in Yoder. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 11:16 am
Watson (Georgia), Sonja R. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
Douglas Laycock has long argued), there is little incentive to compromise. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:02 am
Meter, Douglas B. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
I got to meet and work with more people that I can remember. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
But I thought that I'd pass along this analysis of the briefs in the case from Eric Rassbach of the Becket Fund; unsurprisingly, it track some of the analysis in the Becket Fund's own brief, but I still found to be an interesting, if opinionated, guide. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
I believe that Jesus Christ transubstantiates into a fine Douglas fir sometime after Thanksgiving. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
See R. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
Eugene Volokh and I discussed this comment in a letter submitted to the Iowa Supreme Court: Here, the critical language is "conduct undertaken to promote," which in this context obviously includes speech promoting "diversity and inclusion. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:48 am
Douglas, dissented; I've long found the opinion to be particularly thoughtful and forceful, and since I was reminded of it while preparing for my First Amendment Law class next week, I decided to pass along some excerpts: [A.] [read post]
