Search for: "Evers v. Thomas"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,365
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Judges’ Bill “decisively reoriented the institutional function of the Court toward the management of the law and its reception by the general legal public,” Post explains, and as jurisprudential ideas, controversial issues, and the Court’s membership evolved over the coming decades they sparked ever sharper divisions among the justices. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
Last July, in Missouri v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm
Thomas Merrill on "Does <i>Chevron</i> Mandate <i>Brand X</i>? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
This was the point of Justice Thomas’ very first question to Jason Murray, and it was a recurring theme throughout the argument. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
From Weaver v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The very first question of the day came from Justice Thomas. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Thomas any better? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
No one would have ever known if we didn't publish it. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
Moritz, Thomas C. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
Moritz, Thomas C. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
Thailand A Thai court has sentenced a man to 50 years in jail for comments deemed to have defamed the monarchy – the highest ever sentence handed down under the country’s notorious lese majeste law. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
If I were to make a prediction, I would say that this Romanian case is going to make one of the most relevant CJEU copyright rulings ever issued.In my view, this is so even for reasons beyond the question of originality. [read post]