The Court of Appeals decision reads, in part: "Until today, the interplay between Public Officers Law � 43 and article IV, � 6 of the Constitution presented an open legal question ... [read post]

Specifically, Stillwell argues that (1) Deer Park was not represented by counsel in violation of Indiana Small Claims Rule 8, (2) the trial court abused its discretion by granting Deer Park's requests for continuances, and (3) the trial court improperly engaged in ex parte communication with Deer Park. [read post]