Search for: "Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker"
Results 41 - 60
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) and Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:14 pm
In that ruling, the Court did not discuss the issue of whether those who sued Exxon Shipping Co. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:20 pm
In its decision this week in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
The appeal is Exxon Shipping Co., et al., v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:10 pm
The case of Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:51 pm
According to a story by Legal Times’s Tony Mauro, the footnote at issue is Footnote 17 from this term’s Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
See Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:46 pm
The court then affirmed a punitive damage award but did not apply the Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 11:18 am
Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) and Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:57 pm
ClausenDocket: 11-1475Issue(s): (1) Whether, in determining the ratio between compensatory and punitive damages for purposes of applying federal limits on punitive damages, court-awarded attorney’s fees are properly included as compensatory damages; and (2) whether, and to what extent, punitive damages in maritime cases may exceed the 1:1 ratio between compensatory and punitive damages applied by the Court’s Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
” Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 3:55 pm
Scientific-Atlanta Inc., No. 06-43, and Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
In Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:03 am
U.S. (07-214)– proof needed to show false claim in federal contracting Wed., Feb. 27: Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:52 pm
Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:27 pm
See Exxon Shipping Company, et al v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:13 pm
Second, in case you missed it, footnote 17 in Justice David Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:52 am
Board of Trade, No. 06-1265; a post on Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
