Search for: "F. Ashby" Results 41 - 55 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2014, 8:16 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Though sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) have been around since the 1950s, they became much more important instruments of global finance with the maturing of the current system of globalization. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
PART FOUR: Responding to Guilt, Disgust, and Happiness How Do I Respond to Counterproductive Emotions? [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 9:09 pm
David Giacalone from f/k/a rose to thank us for hosting, but mostly my wife for cooking, and reminded me in particular that there is a back end to this meal which could use a little help. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 7:32 am
I am happy to announce the publication of "Sovereign Wealth Funds, Capacity Building, Development and Governance," which appears in the Wake Forest Law Review 52(4):735-780 (2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The SCC (by a 7-2 majority) dismissed Google’s appeal and upheld the injunction.According to taste and point of view the decision is:(a) a victory for a small Canadian company against a US tech giant(b) a damaging precedent for future overreaching assertions of extraterritorial jurisdiction by other nation states(c) a narrowly decided case about interim injunctions with few broad implications(d) a case that paid insufficient attention to its underlying territorial moorings(e) a decision that… [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The SCC (by a 7-2 majority) dismissed Google’s appeal and upheld the injunction.According to taste and point of view the decision is:(a) a victory for a small Canadian company against a US tech giant(b) a damaging precedent for future overreaching assertions of extraterritorial jurisdiction by other nation states(c) a narrowly decided case about interim injunctions with few broad implications(d) a case that paid insufficient attention to its underlying territorial moorings(e) a decision that… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
According to taste and point of view the decision is: (a) a victory for a small Canadian company against a US tech giant (b) a damaging precedent for future overreaching assertions of extraterritorial jurisdiction by other nation states (c) a narrowly decided case about interim injunctions with few broad implications (d) a case that paid insufficient attention to its underlying territorial moorings (e) a decision that reinforces the role that online intermediaries can and should play in combating… [read post]