Search for: "F. Tv Ltd." Results 41 - 60 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2009, 5:13 pm
Cal. 1995) - James Bond); or* a series of TV episodes devoted to the antics of a reluctant superhero (Warner Bros. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:41 am
"Aigner is by profession a trained radio and TV technician who appears to us intellectually and by educational background to be totally out of her league in her ministerial post. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Canada (Justice), 2018 FC 1189 (CanLII) — 2018-11-27 https://t.co/6YrUwMpSdr 2018-12-16 Yandex and TV Giants Make Peace Over ‘Pirate’ Search Results https://t.co/ZTwWssxyiV 2018-12-16 EU Members Push For Internet Filters Of Terrorist Content On The Internet https://t.co/yOOdiBeSGw 2018-12-16 EU Copyright Reform, Fundamental Rights & Life https://t.co/atXZ7uoJt7 2018-12-16 Another Section 512(f) Case Fails–ISE v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Universal Pictures Corporation, 45 F.2d 119 (2nd Cir. 1930), per Learned Hand J. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
Shiley, Inc., 989 F.2d 142, 148 (3d Cir. 1993) (applying Pennsylvania law); Lauterbach, 1991 WL 148137, at *4 (plaintiff’s “alleged emotional distress was not caused by the actual operation [implanting the device], but was triggered by an ABC-TV 20/20 segment”).Finally, IIED has been asserted against non-manufacturers. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under section… [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Will they be able to provide the Internet and TV services you rely on in the future? [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– report on seminar co-hosted by JMB, Factor & Co and ONO Academic College (The IP Factor) The strange affair of the bleach-free soap-powder – Proctor & Gamble and Reckit Benckisers trade mark battle over ‘al economika’ (English: ‘bleach free’) marks (The IP Factor)   Malaysia Malaysian Court says MCCURRY does not infringe MCDONALD’S (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (IP Spotlight)   Nigeria Francis… [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
(d) The Police Federation (6) About which media lawyer was the following said in a TV drama this year? [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt competition… [read post]