Search for: "F.C.C."
Results 41 - 60
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2017, 5:53 am
For more detail, read this New York Times article titled Trump’s F.C.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:04 am
Prof’l Ass’n for, 30 F.C.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Fortunately, this provision has been used quite sparingly; here’s a passage from an FCC letter based on the provision, Frank Battaglia, 7 FCC Rcd. 2345 (F.C.C.): This is in reference to the Commission inquiry into the broadcast by Station WALE(AM), Providence, Rhode Island, of a hoax broadcast that one of its on-air personalities. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 1:23 pm
Concerning Fairness Doctrine Re NBC, 40 F.C.C.2d 958 (F.C.C. 1973). [2] NBC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Baxter (2012) (exploring regulatory capture in financial regulation) “Virtuous Capture” by Matthew Wansley (argues in favor of the virtues of certain forms of regulatory capture) Testimony of Robert Hockett before the U.S .Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Improving Financial Institution Supervision: Examining and Addressing Regulatory Capture (2012) (making recommendations based on how regulatory capture might be at work at the Fed and other agencies)… [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
Circuit Court of Appeals rejected all challenges to the FCC’s Open Internet Order. [1]The majority deemed limited its review function and opted to apply ample case precedent that defers to regulatory agencies on both procedural and substantive areas. [2] In a nutshell, the majority opted not to second guess the FCC and expressed support for the Commission’s interpretation of law and its assessment of how consumers access the Internet and what they expect from service providers. [3] This… [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 10:09 am
The court’s decision upheld the F.C.C. on the historic declaration of broadband as a utility, the most significant aspect of the rules. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:59 am
(a) Its assessment of broadband providers’ reliance on the now-abandoned classification disregards the record, in violation of its obligation under F.C.C. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:40 am
Before the F.C.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:28 am
F.C.C., No. 15-1211 (D.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
’ F.C.C. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 10:32 am
At the "Bits" blog of The New York Times, Cecilia Kang has a post titled "In Net Neutrality Hearing, Judge Signals Comfort With F.C.C.'s Defense. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:10 am
” 2015 WL 6405811, at *2 (quoting In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 2015 WL 4387780, at *5 (F.C.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:10 am
” 2015 WL 6405811, at *2 (quoting In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 2015 WL 4387780, at *5 (F.C.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:32 pm
He argued that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) rule known as PRB–1, Federal Preemption of State and Local Regulations Pertaining to Amateur Radio Facilities, 101 F.C.C.2d 952 (1985), adopted at 47 CFR § 97.15(b), (“PRB–1”) preempted the Township from restricting antenna height and the Pennsylvania state law adopting the federal standard preempted the township’s antenna height restrictions. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:02 pm
” See also NYT – In Net Neutrality Plan, F.C.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:45 pm
F.C.C. officials say consumers would pay less than $2 a year in additional fees per phone line, or less than $6 extra per household, on average; currently the average household pays about $36 a year. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:23 am
Kowalski, 46 F.C.C.2d 124 (1974), aff’d sub nom. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:23 am
In a New York Times Room for Debate essay, Tim Wu sums it succinctly: At Thursday’s F.C.C. public meeting, Chairman Tom Wheeler declared, with Lincolnesque firmness, that he would stand second to no one in his defense of net neutrality. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
The connection between the two is already clear from Roberts’ dissenting opinion in F.C.C. v. [read post]
