Search for: "FAILS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS" Results 41 - 60 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
" Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation undersecretary Scott Kernan sent that message to assistant secretary Anthony Chaus on Sept. 29. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:13 pm
McNEIL,Secretary,Department of Corrections,State of Florida,Respondents. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
While I am gratified to see some Republicans reverse course and embrace a broadly correct view of the Constitution’s impeachment provisions, Mayorkas’s critics nonetheless fail to make even a colorable case for impeachment employing that standard. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by INFORRM
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:36 am by Matthew Flinn
The authority relied on by the Government included a Court of Appeal decision (R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] EWCA Civ 1868 – “the PH case”) and three High Court decisions (R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2193 (Admin), R v Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2194 (Admin) and IT v… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
To test whether the contrary view of the Secretary’s expert was correct requires examining data from thousands of workers in many workplaces — or at least not disregarding data about “hundreds of worker years” in Caterpillar’s own workplace. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
On Friday, the Justice Department filed a particularly interesting brief in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm by vforberger
The Department also proposes to clarify language in DWD chapter 140 regarding hearing records, Department assistance for people with disabilities at hearings, and to correct minor and technical language in DWD chapter 140. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am by Maria Roche
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment  Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
Docket No. 08-00507-CV-VMC MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OTHER UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, Florida Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (June 27, 2008) Before DUBINA, CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a decision handed down on 24 June 2016 (TLT and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 2217 (QB)) Mitting J ordered the Home Office to pay six claimants a combined total of £39,500 for the misuse of private information and breaches of the Data Protection Act (“DPA”) 1998 arising from the publication online of a spreadsheet. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm by Arshan Barzani
German princes wrote to King George V, offering to substitute themselves for the kaiser. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:42 am by Richard S. Zackin
Background Sherri Minarsky worked as a part-time secretary at the Susquehanna County Department of Veterans Affairs (the “Department”). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:58 am by Leland E. Beck
The hospitals claims and the court agreed that the Secretary had failed to explain adequately her change in policy and regulation. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:06 am by Ben
The Secretary of State welcomes the guidance which the Court has provided as to the correct approach to be adopted as a matter of law when considering the introduction of a private copying exception, and as to the scope and nature of the factual enquiries which are necessary. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:35 am by Laura Sandwell
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]