Search for: "FCC v. Pacifica Foundation"
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2010, 4:38 pm
Pacifica Foundation), and noted that broadcasters and the FCC are still in dispute about just how much authority the Commission has under that ruling. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 11:39 am
The broadcast of that track – on Pacifica Foundation’s Station WBAI(FM) in New York in 1973 – set in motion the FCC’s enforcement action that resulted in the 1978 Supreme Court decision FCC v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 12:33 am
Pacifica Foundation, 438 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:36 pm
There simply is no way to reconcile FCC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:58 am
Pacifica Foundation, in which the Court determined that the FCC has the power to regulate content on the airwaves and set decency standards. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:34 pm
PACIFICA FOUNDATION ET AL. 438 U.S. 726 (1978). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 7:36 am
One common argument in support of indecency regulations is that they merely restrict certain modes of expression, and leave people entirely free to express whatever ideas they like; as Justice Stevens put it, defending the indecency restriction in FCC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am
Pacifica Foundation. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:42 pm
That case, FCC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:05 am
Pacifica Foundation. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:52 pm
Pacifica Foundation upheld the FCC’s decision to reprimand, though not fine or revoke the license of, a public broadcaster after it aired George Carlin’s famous monologue “Filthy Words. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm
Pacifica Foundation granting the FCC limited authority under the First Amendment to regulate broadcast indecency. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
Consider the FCC’s efforts to protect Americans from “dirty words” in FCC v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:20 pm
And, as we stated in FCC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:17 pm
Pacifica Foundation, ruling that the FCC did have the authority under federal law to regulate broadcast speech that was "indecent" but not obscene. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 5:48 pm
[4] Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
Pacifica Foundation in 1978, to take context into account in determining whether a given utterance or depiction was “indecent. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
The upshot of FCC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:20 am
Borrowing from the Supreme Court's "7 Dirty Words Case" (FCC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:36 am
New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968),] and [FCC v.] [read post]
