Search for: "FH "
Results 41 - 60
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2015, 11:20 am
. _______________________________________________ [1] Allen Lo, “Announcing the Patent Purchase Promotion”, Google Public Policy Blog, Google (Apr. 27, 2015) (available at http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2015/04/announcing-patent-purchase-promotion.html). [2] “Patent Purchase Agreement”, Google (last accessed April 29, 2015) (available at http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/patent-purchase-agreement.pdf). [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 2:00 am
., 823 S.W.2d 591, 596 (Tex. 1992); In re FH Partners, L.L.C., 335 S.W.3d 752, 761 (Tex. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
I am advised by a teacher at FHS that 20% of the FHS students, about 400, are Asian. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
I happily used one of my FH tasks for this (feeling like I was rubbing a magic Genie lamp as I did). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
I happily used one of my FH tasks for this (feeling like I was rubbing a magic Genie lamp as I did). [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:28 am
And let's not forget FH Brundle v Perry, where this Kat felt that a patent owner who made unwarranted threats to sue for infringement did quite enough to get to prison but hit an immovable object in the form of a merciful judge.Merpel wonders what they do in other countries. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
The text of that email was as follows:Royal Courts of Justice Patents County CourtRolls Building, Fetter Lane London sales@hmcts.fasteners.co.uk...26th March 2014Claim CC13P00980Dear Mr Perry,I have re-considered the case CC13P00980 and upon reflection; your opponents (FH Brundle, Betafence and Britannia Fasteners) having used your name on purchase orders for the infringing goods protected under your patent (which seems to be a fundamental point in the case), have… [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:32 pm
Details on the service and a complete obituary may be found at http://www.meaningfulfunerals.net/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm? [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:15 am
However it is also a name that has been heard to echo round the courts in recent times: FH Brundle v Perry [2014] EWHC 475 (IPEC) is an Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, ruling of Judge Hacon from 6 March and it addresses that minefield for unsuspecting patent-entitled litigants and their legal advisers -- liability for making groundless threats to sue someone for patent infringement. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:38 am
An African-American security guard worked for Franciscan Health System (FHS), a religious entity, in a hospital ER. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm
Larry Ockletree worked as a security guard for a non-profit religious organization, FHS. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:30 am
FH is a peer-reviewed academic journal published both in print and online. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:00 pm
En 2009 la société FH a fait assigner devant le tribunal de commerce de Chartres la société MT, fondée par 3 de ses anciens salariés, pour concurrence déloyale. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:23 am
Straight from the Shameless Self-Promotion Department, my latest article in the Reading Eagle Business Weekly is now available online: DOMA Ruling Means HR Work for PA Employers. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:56 pm
People must come to IRH knowing what their case is and ready to record what the issues are at FH. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
BC Injury Law And ICBC Claims BlogSubjective Soft Tissue Injuries And Judicial ScrutinyLast year I criticized the often recited judicial passage stating that ““…the Court should be exceedingly careful when there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury and when complaints of pain persist for long periods extending beyond the normal or usual recovery…” and pointing out that these comments should no longer be used given Supreme Court of Canada’s… [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:53 am
Last year I criticized the often recited judicial passage stating that ““…the Court should be exceedingly careful when there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury and when complaints of pain persist for long periods extending beyond the normal or usual recovery…” and pointing out that these comments should no longer be used given Supreme Court of Canada’s reasons in FH v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:15 pm
(Blogmeister Alert to Readers: FH&H represents a client in this proceeding.) [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:25 pm
FH Partners, LLC, 373 S.W.3d 620, 635 (Tex. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:08 pm
FH Partners, LLC, 373 S.W.3d 620, 643 (Tex. [read post]
