Search for: "FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL" Results 41 - 60 of 47,093
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2024, 4:10 am by Scott Bomboy
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals, however, ruled the statute applies to “all forms of obstructive conduct. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 12:50 am by David Pocklington
Nevertheless, Fryer-Spedding Ch. granted a faculty subject to conditions that planning consent should first be obtained, after appeal, and that the panels should be removed at the end of their expected lifespan of 26 years. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:47 pm by Ilya Somin
Judge Tigar's ruling was stayed by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which still has not reached a final decision on the case. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:22 pm by Kalvis Golde
It then sent the cases back to the district courts for further proceedings. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:00 pm by James Nault
") The post Equal Protection Project Influence Reflected in Court of Appeals “Fearless Fund” Antidiscrimination Ruling first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:17 am by Kaufman Dolowich
Circuit Court of Appeals, which is on track to hear the case again following the insured’s […] The post “District Court Bumps-up D&O Insurers’ Coverage Defense: Long-Running Saga Continues,” written by Michael L. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:30 am by Daniele Durkin
While the ELVIS Act appears to be one of the first statutes to address AI-related right of publicity issues in the generative AI (“genAI”) era, it should be noted that back in 2019 New York State amended its right of publicity law (S.B. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:25 am by Throneberry Law Group
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, the industry stakeholders decided to file their petitions in the conservative 5th, 6th, and 11th circuit courts. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by Leland Garvin
Bonefish Grill, Nov. 15, 2023, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal More Blog Entries: Florida Premises Liability Case: Treat Shop Should Anticipate Tripping Hazard, Sept. 27, 2021, Fort Myers Injury Lawyer Blog The post In Fort Myers Slip-and-Fall Lawsuits, Witness Statements May Be Key appeared first on Florida Personal Injury Lawyer Blog. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by Leland Garvin
Bonefish Grill, Nov. 15, 2023, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal More Blog Entries: Florida Premises Liability Case: Treat Shop Should Anticipate Tripping Hazard, Sept. 27, 2021, Fort Myers Injury Lawyer Blog The post In Fort Myers Slip-and-Fall Lawsuits, Witness Statements May Be Key appeared first on Florida Personal Injury Lawyer Blog. [read post]
The ruling upheld the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia that had previously found Houston County’s actions to be discriminatory under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, citing Bostock v. [read post]
The ruling upheld the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia that had previously found Houston County’s actions to be discriminatory under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, citing Bostock v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 2:30 am by David Oscar Markus
  We therefore affirm the district court’s determination that the Alliance has standing to sue but otherwise reverse its decision and remand with instructions to enter a preliminary injunction. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Peter Rawlings
When the Board declined, the district court dismissed the petition, and the agency appealed.The Second Circuit Summary DecisionIn its decision, the Second Circuit first confirmed that the district court was not prohibited from allowing “limited expedited discovery” in a 10(j) proceeding. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
Ct. of Appeals of Wisconsin, observing: The attorney must … provide his or her client precisely the services that an affluent defendant could obtain from paid counsel….the attorney must be zealous and must resolve all doubts and ambiguous legal questions in favor of his or her client.However, the Court has not held that the Constitution requires that a defendant receive the assistance of a zealous advocate. [read post]