Search for: "FIRST PLACE v. Security Nat. Bank" Results 41 - 60 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
Just as there is no First Amendment right to use the copyrighted work of another, Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
This is a 53-page decision that considered first issues of standing and then "the Government’s proffered justifications for the CTA’s constitutionality—that the CTA falls within the ambit of the Commerce, Taxing, and Necessary and Proper Clauses, along with Congress’ foreign affairs and national security powers. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm by MOTP
App. 176.In October 2017 Moss filed suit in Dallas County Justice Court on behalf of its client, Barclays Delaware Bank ("Barclays"), to collect a delinquent debt owed by Christopher O. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
Bank obtained this mortgage in the first place, since it already had obtained a foreclosure judgment in state court, and because there is an irritating (to Federal judges) and arcane Rooker-Feldman doctrine that prohibits federal courts from interfering with state court judgments. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 11:13 am
The administrator served as a notary and two nurses observed Catelli place an "X" on the line Thomas indicated. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:16 am
The administrator served as a notary and two nurses observed Catelli place an "X" on the line Thomas indicated. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 11:11 am
The administrator served as a notary and two nurses observed Catelli place an "X" on the line Thomas indicated. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
These types of conflicts, of course, are not unprecedented.[23]  For example, U.S. courts for many years have had to determine whether to enforce (via contempt citations) U.S. grand jury subpoenas seeking documents, despite claims by the recipients of those subpoenas that compliance would violate foreign laws, such as bank secrecy laws.[24]  Some decisions have rejected arguments that it is “unfair to require the [recipient of the subpoena] to be put in the position of… [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
Either the terms the parties agreed to were in code in the first place and were not “transformed,” or they were in natural language[xxi]—English, for example—and the code “contains [a translation of] the terms. [read post]