Search for: "Faretta v. California"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2008, 12:44 pm
In the 1975 case of Faretta vs. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:51 am
The court may not leave a criminal defendant without counsel unless it complies with the procedure described in Faretta v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
If he never hit the books actually studying criminal law, he might want to look up Faretta v California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
Janis were violated when his counsel entered the “functional equivalent of a guilty plea” to first-degree murder over his objections; (3) whether the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to self-representation under Faretta v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm
California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 1:43 pm
See Faretta v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:28 pm
The court had declared 25 years before, in Faretta v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Moore Issue: Did the Sixth Circuit properly interpret Faretta v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:38 pm
In Indiana v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 6:53 am
Similarly, while the Constitution grants a defendant a right to counsel, the United States Supreme Court held in Faretta v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
Rodgers12-382Issue: Whether Faretta v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:30 pm
Edwards overruled Faretta v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:38 am
On May 7, 2014, the court conducted a hearing pursuant to Faretta v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 7:49 am
Faretta v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Hamlin: Defendant cannot be sentenced to jail unless offered appointment of counsel. 1975 Faretta v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:03 am
Second, although the Court has held that a defendant has the constitutional right to represent himself in Faretta v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Rodgers12-382Issue: Whether Faretta v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
Janis were violated when his counsel entered the “functional equivalent of a guilty plea” to first-degree murder over his objections; (3) whether the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to self-representation under Faretta v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Rodgers, 12-382, concerns the “clearly established” standard in Section 2254(d), asking whether Faretta v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
Timothy Howard v. [read post]
