Search for: "Federal Insurance Company v. American Home Assurance Company" Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
” This, according to Spokeo, is the same QP as in First American Financial v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Although the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination based on disability by entities receiving federal funds, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) extended this protection more broadly to non-federally funded entities, it has been difficult to enforce federal disability protections in medical decision-making. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs, in their positions five to 21 years, never previously challenged the unclassified nature of their jobs http://j.st/S4w  Iowa Assurance Corp., et al. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
Section 238-a of NYS Public Health Law is sometimes referred to as “mini-Stark” as it somewhat parallels the federal law by the same name. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
  By itself, off-label promotion is no more causal than, as we commented the other day, a “video of a company employee kicking his dog. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
And Fox surely tempers its various legal risks related to the uncertainties of multistate libel law with insurance, which is also a cost. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
-based firms (including subsidiaries) with at least $500 million in annual revenues would likely qualify as “doing business” in California.[17] (Insurance companies, which are covered by other separate legislation in California, are excluded.) [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The committee will hear testimony from Luis Almagro, secretary general of the Organization of American States; Deborah Ulmer, regional director for Latin America and the Caribbean at the National Democratic Institute; and Ryan Berg, fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
  Not only that, but since a federal bankruptcy judge still cannot modify a mortgage by lowering payments or extending the term, Claudia had darn fine reason to rely on the bank’s promise to help her reinstate her loan, and provide her with more favorable terms. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (2000) 529 U.S. 861, 868, 120 S.Ct. 1913, 146 L.Ed.2d 914) (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) “[A] reading of the express pre-emption provision that excludes common-law tort actions gives actual meaning to the saving clause's literal language, while leaving adequate room for state tort law to operate-for example, where federal law creates only a floor, i.e., a minimum safety standard. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Shaw for Amici Curiae Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Servicingon behalf of Real Parties in Interest.Wright, Finlay & Zak, Thomas Robert Finlay and Jennifer A. [read post]