Search for: "Fee v. Employment Appeal Bd."
Results 41 - 60
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
” Buckhannon Bd. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:06 pm
Detroit Bd. of Ed., 431 U.S. 209. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Appeals -- Attorney's fees -- Challenge to fee award on ground that trial court erred in failing to examine time records and lawyer's testimony in making fee award, failed to make findings as to fee multiplier, and applied overly narrow interpretation of Sunshine Law's fee-shifting statutes -- Standard of review for award of attorney's fees is abuse of discretion -- Record before appellate court does not provide… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Bd. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Bd. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Both parties appealed. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Avalos v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 8:55 am
PAGA also provides for the recovery of costs and attorney’s fees. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
(Pacific Employers Ins. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Upheld on appeal. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:20 pm
--Madry v Gibraltor Nat’l Corp, EDMich: An employment application that shortened the limitations period for employment claims to 180 days, and required an employee to pay the employer’s attorneys’ fees if she brought an unsuccessful claim, was unenforceable against an FMLA suit. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
The plaintiff unsuccessfully appealed that decision to both the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals and the Medicare Appeals Council. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 12:40 pm
Review Bd., 514 F. 3d 468, 477 (5th Cir. 2008) (applying “reasonable belief” standard in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower retaliation action); Kalkunte v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:47 pm
Review Bd., 514 F. 3d 468, 477 (5th Cir. 2008) (applying “reasonable belief” standard in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower retaliation action); Kalkunte v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:35 am
Review Bd., 514 F. 3d 468, 477 (5th Cir. 2008) (applying “reasonable belief” standard in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower retaliation action); Kalkunte v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:49 pm
Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445 (Tex. 1993). [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Dec. 19, 2008)Absence of 50(b) motion in the trial court deprives Appeals Court of ability to consider AT&T's appeal from J* for EEOC on its religion (Jehovah's Witnesses)/failure-to-accommodate, discharge discrim suitDC Circuit* Adams v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, December 15, 2008 Doe, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County, Ala., No. 08-488*Title VII/ (1) Can a court-appointed receiver be sued as an employer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for retaliatory employment decisions made during his receivership? [read post]
