Search for: "Fells Point Productions, LLC." Results 41 - 60 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2022, 9:42 am by Eric Goldman
McNaughton claimed that the product fell off his boat, it was heavy, he encouraged buyers not to purchase the product, and, ultimately, pointed potential buyers to his product by referencing it by name and praising his product. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 10:05 pm
Searle LLC (2) Janssen Sciences Ireland UC [2017] EWHC 987 (Pat). [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:11 am
Thoroughbred Legends, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 8:14 am by James P. Flynn
The Titan Non-Compete Clause Falls Short While the factual reasons that the Titan clause fell short of the Marsh/Light requirements were important under Texas law, they may also point to issues employers, staffing agencies, prime contractors, and others who place independent contractors may face even outside Texas. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:52 pm
Raw numbers do not suffice, and sales figures may not reflect awareness or recognition of the mark applied to the product. [read post]
9 May 2017, 3:45 am
The burden of production then shifted to the opposer to produce evidence that it intended to resume use. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 11:43 am by Nedim Malovic
This benchmark also applies to signs which are only applicable to a component or an element of the appearance of the product, in the case at hand the tread and outer portion of a tyre (T-390/06, Pallet, EU:T:2008:427).i) Relevant public and degree of attentionThe board observed that the goods were mainly aimed at a professional public displaying a high level of attention. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:46 am by aschwartz
Third Point LLC has agreed to pay more than $600,000 to settle allegations the hedge fund failed to properly file for antitrust clearance when it bought DowDuPont stock two years ago, the U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  Second, isn't the court missing the point as to whether the FDA has already suggested an answer? [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by David M. McLain
In so ruling, Judge Martinez quoted favorably a Tennessee case that held, “the cost to repair a defectively installed product does not constitute ‘property damage’ unless the defective product causes some damage to the property outside of the cost to replace the defective product. [read post]