Search for: "Fells v. Walker"
Results 41 - 60
of 171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 8:13 pm
(Pacific Legal Foundation v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
Lord Neuberger then went on to consider whether “non-commercial confidential information” fell within the ambit of the definition of intellectual property in section 72. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:46 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Several of the majority decisions in Stott endorsed Lord Walker’s analysis in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63, [2009] 2 All ER 556 that the characteristics which fell within ECHR, art 14 were like a series of concentric circles: with the most personal innate characteristics being at the centre and requiring a high level of justification for differential treatment, and acquired characteristics (which are more concerned with what… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:07 am
Walker. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 6:19 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has ruled in Walker v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
” County of Sacramento v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:42 pm
The Illinois wrongful death lawsuit of Sorce v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:42 pm
The Illinois wrongful death lawsuit of Sorce v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:12 pm
Earlier today, the Mississippi Supreme Court released its opinion in Allen v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 5:06 am
The court, in Grinberg v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:34 pm
Last week, the Maryland Court of Appeals decided the case of Morgan State University v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:34 pm
Last week, the Maryland Court of Appeals decided the case of Morgan State University v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:24 am
Last week, in Stewart v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:55 am
Lord Wilson dismissed it on the basis that information held predominantly for the purposes of journalism was exempt, and that the Balen Report fell under this category of information. [read post]
