Search for: "Fenwick v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2016, 7:58 am by Mark Astarita
Graham, Managing Partner of Fenwick & West LLP’s Seattle office, and Sara Hanks, CEO of CrowdCheck in Alexandria, Virginia, will serve as co-chairs of the committee. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:09 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By Laura Maechtlen and Sam Schwartz-Fenwick In a landmark ruling on July 15, 2015 in _____ [name of charging party kept secret] v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In addition to requiring the state to inform it of just satisfaction to individual applicants, the member state is required to implement general measures to ensure future applicants are not affected. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:01 am by John Jascob
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. sued FAPL Holdings Inc. and four of FAPL’s principals for fraud based on the plaintiff’s purchase of capital stock of Fenwick Automotive Products Ltd. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:14 am by Broc Romanek
In the announcement, CalPERS states it has sent proxy access shareholder proposals to 33 energy companies as a way to push this climate change agenda. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Conduct: required mental state; nature of infringement (qualitative); amount (quantitative). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:22 am by Eric
Becker (the Georgia State coursepack case) from James Grimmelmann and Inside Higher Ed [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Wessen Jazrawi
For instance, while the political implications of e.g., the M v Germany judgment were recognised in Germany, there was never any question that it would not be implemented. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:52 am by Wessen Jazrawi
An excellent post by Helen Fenwick on the UK Constitutional Law Group blog on whether two recent decisions by the Strasbourg court, Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2), represent a move towards the appeasement of certain signatory states. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:38 am by Dennis Crouch
Sachs of Fenwick & West LLPRead Part I; Part II; Part III; and Part IV. [read post]