Search for: "Feres v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am
United States, 20-559Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 11:47 am
United States 24-683Issue: Whether Feres v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:32 pm
United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950); Chappell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm
In part, this was due to the Feres Doctrine (Feres v. the United States, 340 U.S. 135), which prohibits individuals from filing a lawsuit or lawsuit based on injuries during their service. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am
United States, which bars servicemembers from suing the federal government for personal injuries related to their military service, Stephen Vladeck, in an op-ed for The New York Times, urges Congress to overturn the Feres doctrine “in its entirety. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The Feres doctrine, stemming from the 1950 Feres v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:52 am
United States, 486 U.S. 531 (1988) and United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:09 pm
United States, Justice Thomas dissented because he believes the Court should overrule Feres v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:32 pm
United States, where the U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:28 am
The case involves the so-called Feres doctrine, after Feres v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:19 pm
Because the Feres doctrine bars all military personnel from suing the United States for negligent and wrongful conduct resulting in injury or death, these victimized families have no cause of action against the United States, i.e., for negligent failure to provide for the safety of their soldier husband, father, or son. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
