Search for: "Fictitious Defendants 1-3"
Results 41 - 60
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2011, 8:47 am
The complaint and all information provided to the court should be carefully reviewed to determine whether plaintiff has set forth a prima facie cause of action against the fictitiously-named anonymous defendants . . . [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:57 am
Lanham Act false advertising: Challenged statements: (1) Defendants are “the largest wound specialty practice focused exclusively on the post-acute sector;” (2) Defendants can provide wound care to “hundreds of thousands of patients annually across 27 states;” and (3) “[Vohra is] a national physician’s practice facilitating this option and not a vendor. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:00 am
El Mexicano was fictitiously named as Doe 1 February 13, 2008. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:47 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:24 pm
Maryland.Thus, the court held that the defendants did have standing despite the fictitious name, but there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:23 am
The Defendant: LAURIE SCHNEIDER Age: 37 [1] The charges in the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm
Tankleff and other defendants who were coerced into falsely confessing by police use of deception and later exonerated, will be examined in a future post. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Instead, they functioned as pass-throughs, taking between 3% and 6% of the invoice amounts as “overhead,” and sending the remainder of $3.352 million to two fictitious shell companies created by Tappe: High Galaxy Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Instead, they functioned as pass-throughs, taking between 3% and 6% of the invoice amounts as “overhead,” and sending the remainder of $3.352 million to two fictitious shell companies created by Tappe: High Galaxy Inc. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:32 pm
., 751 N.W.2d 805 (Wisc. 2008), a sharply divided Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed a default judgment entered against an insurer for damages allegedly caused by its co-defendant insureds’ negligence, even though no finding had been made as to the insureds’ liability for the damages at issue.In Otto, the plaintiffs sued the insureds for medical malpractice, designating the defendants’ as-yet-unknown insurer as a “fictitious”… [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:33 pm
On appeal they challenged the government's failure to allege materiality under either section.(1) The Court held that Sect 287 does not require proof of materiality because the statute applies to the filing of a claim, "knowing such claim to be false, fictitious or fraudulent. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:59 am
Here are a couple notes:1. [read post]
12 May 2019, 2:15 pm
The applicants sought for ss. 2(1), 153.1, 227.1(1), 237.1 and 248(1) of the Income Tax Act (“ITA”), ss. 4.3, 122, 123(1) of the the Excise Tax Act (“ETA”), and ss. 1(1), 1 (2), 6, 115.2, 133 and 167 of the Ontario Business Corporations Act (“OBCA”) to be of no force and effect. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:31 am
Plaintiffs are unaware of the true names and capacities of those defendants sued herein as DOES 1-20. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
Code §1546(b)(3). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:52 am
Apologies at their fullest are: (1) communications that (2) acknowledge any wrongdoing, (3) as well as the harm and its consequences, (4) take responsibility, (5) convey regret for having caused harm to those affected, (5) provide compensation or other efforts to restore those affected, and (6) promise non-repetition of the harm-causing behavior.First, it is concerning that the judge thought the only relevant parties to an apology were the judges to whom the fictitious… [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
They must prove that the defendant acted with "actual malice." [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:42 am
Background Satyam was quickly dubbed the "Indian Enron" when it was revealed in January 2009 – in a stunning letter of confession from the company’s founder and Chairman -- that more than $1 billion of revenue that the company had reported over several years was fictitious. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
That’s why we have incidents like this: 1. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:37 am
§§ 80b-6(1) and 80b-6(2). [read post]
