Search for: "Fields et al v. United States of America"
Results 41 - 60
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
In the first of the three lawsuits filed against Hifter, Elzagally et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 5:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:01 am
The Court overturned the convictions in the Moore et al. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 2:26 pm
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, et al. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am
While prospects for significant federal spending on a new broadband program remain in limbo, Congress has allocated further funding to the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) ReConnect funding for 2020 (item below). [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:30 am
Fallon, Jr., et al., Hart and Wechsler’s the Federal Courts and the Federal System (2015); see also Richard H. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:22 am
Facts: This case (Tucker et al V. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
" United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:02 am
Facts: This case (United States of America et al v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 7:30 am
Facts: This case (Fulmer et al v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am
E. coliO157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4] The E. coli bacterium is among the most… [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
Robert Sherwin’s article Ambiguity in Anti-SLAPP Law and Frivolous Litigation is cited in the following article: George Wyeth et al., The Impact of Citizen Environmental Science in the United States, 49 ELR 10237 (2019). 5. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:24 am
United States of America et al – United States District Court – District of Arizona – February 19th, 2019) involves an environmental claim. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:21 am
Idaho State University et al – United States District Court – Idaho District Court – February 15th, 2019) involves a discrimination claim. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 2:09 pm
United States of America, which is currently on appeal. [read post]
